For coaches and care providers
How Scholexis turns diagnosed student conditions into application behavior and keeps agreed scaffolding available between sessions.
The condition changes the application
Scholexis is built for students with diagnosed ADHD, autism, or learning disabilities, or an established neurodivergent support context. It does not assess, screen, diagnose, or treat. It starts from known conditions and changes application behavior because of what those conditions actually do.
Task hesitancy means starting may cost more than doing, and the most overdue item may be the least startable because it has become so loaded. Therefore the app ranks for startability before urgency and can make the first action almost embarrassingly small.
Time blindness includes estimation failure, not merely forgotten dates. Therefore work appears as proportional shape and future defaults learn quietly from actual-versus-estimated time.
Interruption cost means an interruption may end the work rather than pause it. Therefore Scholexis preserves where the student stopped, what was happening, and what comes next.
Asking is the hard part means the social judgment and language of a request may cost more than the need itself. Therefore the app drafts language the student controls and sends; Scholexis never sends it.
The source-of-truth map connects 24 conditions to 76 distinct application functions and tracks each as built, partial, unbuilt, or still unverified. See the condition-to-function map.
You are working blind between sessions
You meet weekly. In the intervening six days, the plan you built together either held or quietly fell apart, and you find out which in the first ten minutes of the next session, from memory, from a student who is not a reliable narrator of their own week.
The usual workarounds are all bad. A shared password is a boundary violation and a security problem. A screenshot is stale before the session ends. Asking the parent turns you into a third party in a family argument.
What exists today, precisely
A named, student-granted view. The student grants access to you, by name. Not a shared password. They can see that you have it and revoke it whenever they want, and that visibility is what keeps them entering honest data — which is what makes the record worth your time at all.
View-only or edit, the student picks. If they grant Edit, the plan you build together in session is the plan that exists afterwards — you enter it, not them, which matters because re-entering it later is exactly the task they will not do.
One category is shareable today: planning items — assignments, tasks, and courses. That is the whole list right now.
Accommodations, energy check-ins, focus history, grades and profile cannot be shared yet, and that is a limit of what is built rather than a position. The aim is that a student can share anything they choose with anyone they choose. Each category arrives with its own opt-in when it is ready.
What you actually see: which assignments got started and which sat, what their reported capacity looked like across the week rather than on the day you happened to meet, and where the same step keeps getting rescheduled — which is usually the real conversation.
What does not exist yet, so you can plan around it
No caseload view — one student at a time. No coverage or shared access for a group practice. No billing, notes, or anything resembling practice management. Access can carry an expiry date, set when the grant is made, so an engagement can end without anyone having to remember to end it.
There is no clinical function here. Nothing in it assesses, screens, diagnoses, treats, or advises. Scholexis operationalizes known conditions between encounters; it is not a substitute for the encounter.
The stance
We support the coaching relationship. We are not trying to replace it, and we do not think an app can do what you do.
The gap we close is the six days you are not in the room.
Getting a seat
Access is granted by the student, from their own account, so the practical route runs through a student you already work with. Signup is open and free — there is no application and no waitlist.
Send your client this page. It is the exact steps, written for them, and it is the thing that has been missing — the last instruction should not be “go find a feature.”
The honest caveat is not availability, it is fit: the model above assumes one coach, one student, weekly. If you run a group practice or carry forty clients, the pieces you would need are on the list above under what does not exist yet.